|
Post by MTS on Sept 12, 2021 16:20:20 GMT
There was only one team celebrating a 0-0 draw at full time, must have been not conceding a goal against a big team.
|
|
|
Post by hfc on Sept 12, 2021 17:06:29 GMT
Yeah, the Tarts.......
|
|
|
Post by countyjambo on Sept 13, 2021 3:35:26 GMT
GMS had the clearest chance and brought out a good save, Gordon had a good match , overall Hearts played well against 12 men,Walsh argualbly the worst Derby ref i have seen, Porteos the new Scott Brown
|
|
|
Post by dav 21/5/16 on Sept 13, 2021 5:12:20 GMT
Think the ref was as bad for both teams, got a lot wrong on the day for both sides but only managed to card one player from each side.
Celebrate not me, this thing that players come over to clap fans especially in away games is good however and shows appreciation for the support and fans return for the effort the team put in.
The game was there to be won so disappointed in a way to drop 2 points, but I can easily say that Hearts fans will say the same. On the whole we are probably happier at the result being the away team.
|
|
|
Post by K19 on Sept 13, 2021 6:17:56 GMT
Fast and furious, non-stop, end to end with thundering tackles, shots on target, good saves and both sets of supporters lambasting the referee for being useless. Perfect 0-0 really.
|
|
|
Post by hfc on Sept 13, 2021 17:28:24 GMT
A bit harsh on the ref i think. He actually let a fair bit go which i quite like. Yes and also a few fickle things too but i wasn't unhappy about his performance.
|
|
|
Post by drj1956 on Sept 13, 2021 19:05:17 GMT
You must be joking. The referee had a shocker.
|
|
|
Post by dav 21/5/16 on Sept 15, 2021 11:08:28 GMT
Wasn’t a shocker but made a few glaring mistakes for each team, don’t think I remember any which were major influences on the game. If you think any were call them out.
|
|
|
Post by baldbobby on Sept 15, 2021 15:10:59 GMT
One I can think of was when Halkettessi was fouled by a Hibbee and didn’t go down but instead rode the challenge, clearly Hearts had an advantage if play had been allowed to carry on but he called it back for the foul. Apart from that I cannot recall any major fuckups on his part. I see a lot of you thought it was a good game but I thought it was quite meh. May have more to do with me watching it with the sound very low in my hotel room thereby not feeling the atmosphere as much?
|
|
|
Post by drj1956 on Sept 15, 2021 15:47:37 GMT
Apart from the Halkett thing there was nothing major but a helluva lot of consistency. Blowing for some very soft fouls and letting other Stronger ones go. Sorry ,but for me,he had a mare of a game. I do agree though that it was as much one way as the other.
|
|
|
Post by K19 on Sept 15, 2021 17:03:00 GMT
Apart from the Halkett thing there was nothing major but a helluva lot of consistency. Blowing for some very soft fouls and letting other Stronger ones go. Sorry ,but for me,he had a mare of a game. I do agree though that it was as much one way as the other. The Halkett thing tho was inexplicable - if the ref was sending off the Hobo or if the Hobo broke his skull I can sort of understand why he would stop a very promising attack and call back play, but it was just a stupid decision. So stupid, we all called it at the time and are now commenting on it without having to rack our brains to think 'which foul was that?". The ref can't use the excuse of 'letting play continue because there is advantage' and let dangerous fouls/rugby tackles go so they can keep play flowing (scared to make a decision, gets them off the hook), then stop Halkett in his tracks when he rides an attempted foul and his team are on the attack. In fact, if there was a better example in the game of when a ref SHOULD have played advantage, I must have been distracted for a second and missed it.
|
|
|
Post by drj1956 on Sept 15, 2021 17:47:20 GMT
My take on the Halkett thing, only because nothing else makes sense, is that he originally blew to give a free kick to Hibs and realised after he had blown that he had got it the wrong way round
|
|