|
Post by K19 on Sept 26, 2018 4:51:33 GMT
In an effort to stop clubs stockpiling young talent, FIFA propose to limit the number of players loaned OUT by clubs to six. Chelski currently have forty players out on loan. I assume this is just the big clubs complaining that Chelski and co sign players just to make sure their rivals don't get them rather than with any intention of playing them? www.bbc.com/sport/football/45643965Not sure what effect this will have in the long term. Obviously clubs like Chelski will have to either sign less players or just have them hanging around not playing football but in the long term will the kids just not get the opportunities they currently have of being signed by a big club and getting top level coaching - will they give up on football altogether?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2018 7:37:01 GMT
Hearts have 7 out on loan, Sammon, Martin, Moore, Edwards, Burns, Currie and Keena. I don't think any of them would play if they were still at the club.
|
|
|
Post by drj1956 on Sept 26, 2018 8:12:00 GMT
Your right Harry but with the exception of Martin and Sammon they are out to develop. Edwards is the oddest one. Have the club already decided he is for the off? If not would be be bettervstaying with the reserves and trying to fight his way in.
Otherwise.... I don't agree that these kids would be rejected from football, they would start off at lower level and work their way up like they used to.
|
|
|
Post by MTS on Sept 26, 2018 9:18:13 GMT
It’s the only way to develop our laddie’s / fringe players. I agree that 40 players on loan is far too much, do Chelsea have these guys watched on a weekly basis ? Hearts definitely have their young guys watched. Edwards is an odd one as he’s in St Mirren’s starting line up every week.
|
|
|
Post by drj1956 on Sept 26, 2018 10:58:43 GMT
To be fair MTS st mudden are bottom of the league we are top. World of difference. I still think it's an odd one though. Maybe we have already determined he isn't going to be for us.
|
|
|
Post by Dedrokstar on Oct 1, 2018 14:42:24 GMT
So, why did we sign him?
I'm pretty sure several posters questioned the signing at the time but he was barely used even pre-season. Another mystery not quite as deep as why Malaury Martin got a 3.5 year contract after just 2 weeks at the club.
|
|
|
Post by maroon1 on Oct 1, 2018 19:42:57 GMT
|
|